Affidavits
In the
recent past, we have been treated to the extensive use of a new word –
Affidavit. In this country, such new words have a way of getting a life of
their own. Examples of other words which we have come to embrace in a renewed
way include; reforms, multi-partysm, constitution, affirmative action,
inclusion, consultation, mediation, and resignation, among many others.
Deviation from Press Releases
Most of us
watch news to see whether one public figure or other would be taking his
political fight to the media. There is the usual boring setup of tables and
chairs usually outdoors, but also commonly in some dull board room somewhere.
All major (and most minor) media houses will be present as one can tell from
the branded attachments to the sea of microphones. The first shot of the press
release will show everyone to have arrived apart from the actual speaker as can
be evidenced by the empty seat towards which all the microphones are pointed.
There will
be some grumbling among the grim faced attendees of the function. This will
only die down when the spokesman makes a grand entrance and shoves himself towards
the seat reserved for him. Most of the attendees will not have seats but will
strategically position themselves behind the spokesman as if to ensure their
families and friends will see them on prime-time news.
The
spokesperson will clear his throat, apologise for being late (even if he was
just outside the gate), and proceed to read a hastily prepared generic speech.
The speech is just a filler. The meat of the issue will of course be contained
in the off-the-cuff remarks that are sure to follow afterwards. It is during
this crucial session that the multitude behind him will nod their heads in
agreement at every word he says while at the same maintaining their serious
faces, lest you think this is a joking matter.
Now you can
relax in the knowledge that press conferences will no longer be made. We have
moved to the era of affidavits. For those who don’t know, an affidavit is a
written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in
court. This is good news because it then means that, all the juicy dossiers we
are getting from the affidavits are admissible in court. This is not the case
with press releases.
It’s not about Giving Back the Stolen
Money
In case you
may be wondering, I am not trying to look for ways to end corruption in Kenya.
I am merely saying that if we have to do it, let’s do it with befitting decorum.
One no longer needs to deny all knowledge of lost money. All they have to do is
swear an affidavit to tell us about other money which we didn’t even know was
missing as well as revealing previously faceless thieves.
It is about Explaining how the Money
was Spent
The
government, like any other institution, runs on a predetermined budget. Many
times however, the budget ends up being impractical and those charged with
implementing it are forced to engage their creativity in modifying it (Ooh!
Bless them!). Through an affidavit, it is possible to explain how these
previously unknown adjustments were made and why. Nobody needs to go to jail
and no money needs to be returned. After all, nothing was stolen and by
extension, nobody stole anything.
Redefining Corruption
Corruption
is such an ugly word. It appears even uglier if it is used in reference to the
noble activities carried out by people who have to think on their feet and deal
with all the contingencies involved in running a government and other big
institutions. Let us not call those who are suspected of fraud corrupt. Let us
patiently wait for the courts to declare them either dirty or clean. Let us not
call the courts corrupt. Let us instead give them a chance to explain what is
happening in high profile cases where they are accused of taking bribes.
Paving the Way for ‘Clean’ Corruption
When
HIV/AIDS was declared a national disaster, the government went all out to
ensure infection rates were reduced. It did not make a moral issue of saying
promiscuity was a major contributing factor. Instead, it ensured that there
were enough condoms for people who did not think of abstinence or faithfulness
as viable options. The same should be done for corruption. It should be
declared a national disaster. This would ensure that those who would feel that stopping
corruption is not practical would be provided with a level playing field. This
would help them to conduct their corruption business with the decorum that it
so obviously lacks at the moment.